When I saw a trailer for J.C. Chandor’s 80s crime drama, A Most Violent Year, I was intrigued, but I had some doubts. I was worried that the film would try to imitate other 80s mafia movies like Goodfellas or Scarface. Luckily A Most Violent Year instead carves out its own niche in a somewhat worn out genre. A Most Violent Year is the story of Abel Morales (Oscar Isaac), an immigrant trying to create a successful business in 1981, New York City’s ‘most violent’ year statistically.
A Most Violent Year is unique because despite its title there is hardly any violence shown on screen. There are a few moments, but nothing compared to your typical crime film these days. The threat of violence is very important to the film though, it permeates the plot and is always in the background, usually through the radio. When violence is shown it has a powerful impact, especially the last scene.
The most refreshing and enjoyable aspect of the film to me is its perspective on its protagonist, Abel Morales. A lot of films are heavy handed when it comes to their characters and the ‘message’ they want to send. People are often portrayed as black and white with no shades of grey. But A Most Violent Year is different. Abel isn’t portrayed as a ‘hero.’ He is a good man, but there are times when the audience questions what he does. I wasn’t always sure he was right in his decisions. Sometimes I thought, hell, maybe he should arm all his drivers. Maybe he should let his wife (Jessica Chastain) involve her father to solve their problems. But Abel sticks to his choice, and he manages to not do it in a ‘preachy,’ ‘I’m better than you’ way. Oscar Isaac always keeps Abel likeable and sympathetic, whereas another actor might have made him annoying. A Most Violent Year doesn’t have that stamp of righteousness on it like big Hollywood productions have. And that’s why I liked it. It is a very personal film that made me really care for its characters. Jessica Chastain is good in the film, but there are a few moments when her character threatens to turn the film into a gangster cliche. A Most Violent Year is definitely a good film, but it is very slow. I enjoy the risks it takes and Oscar Isaac and Jessica Chastain are very good. But it’s not a film that I would watch again. I would recommend the movie to film buffs who enjoy intelligent films. But I don’t think it is a movie that the average film goer would enjoy. But maybe I’m underestimating people. A Most Violent Year gets 7 camel colored coats out of 10.
Space terrifies me. There’s something about the vast, silent space that spooks me. So for me, Christopher Nolan’s Interstellar is like a horror movie. When Romilly (David Gyasi) mentions that there are just a few sheets of metal separating them from outer space and death I found myself nodding, ‘yes, indeed.’ No way am I ever being launched into space. I almost didn’t see Interstellar because of my fear and because I’m not really interested in space. But I’m glad that I did go see it. There’s nothing else like it, it is a truly unique film that pairs science with an emotional storyline.
What I liked the most about Interstellar was how immersive the experience was. There were a few moments when I genuinely felt I was there, experiencing things alongside the other crew members. These moments, like going through the wormhole, truly touched me. I can’t remember the last time I had such an awe inspiring cinematic moment like that. These kinds of moments are when I really loved Interstellar.
When I went into Interstellar my expectations were not very high. I am not a huge Christopher Nolan fan. I like The Dark Knight quite a bit although I feel that it is overly long. Inception I have only seen once because I thought meh, it’s okay. I absolutely love The Prestige though, that movie blew me away and really surprised me. I feel with Nolan’s films that there are always a few aspects that he gets wrong. His movies are way too long. Most good movies are about 2 hours long, rarely are good ones any longer. I get sick of sitting around for much longer than 2 hours, unless it’s a really engrossing film. Nolan’s movies seem to always be around the 3 hour mark. Too long for my liking. The women in his movies seem to always be two dimensional and weak or uninteresting. And I also find that his movies lack emotion or heart because of his relatively cold directing style. And also, there’s never any sex. I’m not a perv, but come on, Nolan. Sexuality is a big part of what it means to be human.
Having said all that I feel that Interstellar is an improvement on all those fronts and a step in the right direction for Nolan. The running time is still quite long and my bum was getting a bit sore by the end. I felt the beginning of the movie was a little slow and too heavy on the exposition. Actually the whole film is exposition heavy, but I can forgive it at certain parts. Since I’m not into space or science I think it was better that the film explained a lot of things. I also hated near the end having to watch Murph yet again looking at her bookshelf and arguing with her dad, etc. I understand it was emotional for Cooper (Matthew McConaughey), but I wished I could hit the fast forward button.
In terms of the portrayal of female characters, Christopher Nolan has mildly improved. Murphy is fleshed out quite well. I think that is mostly due to the incredible acting of Jessica Chastain. I’ve never really liked her in anything I’ve seen before until now. Here she has a lot of depth and emotion behind her eyes. She’s especially impressive in her scene by Michael Caine’s bedside (side note: could they not have made him physically age somehow?). My problem with Murph was, how can she hold onto so much hatred towards her father for 23 years? Wouldn’t she eventually matured and understood that he was trying to save the human race? If not, then why was she so devoted to the same cause? And then, since early on the movie goes to great lengths to establish that Cooper and Murph are very close during her childhood. How can she entertain, even for a second, that Cooper abandoned her and her brother in order to save himself? That rang so false and untrue to me.
And then there’s Brand (Anne Hathaway) who is the stereotypically difficult female member of the crew. *Yawn* Not only that, but of course the woman is the one motivated by love. Cooper is too, but no one ever tells him that’s wrong and that he should think too clearly. That he’s being ‘too emotional.’ I laughed when Brand admitted she was in love with Edmunds. It was just so typical. I wish Nolan, and his brother, Jonathan, who co-writes his films, would get a little more imaginative with his female characters.
If Christopher Nolan’s other films are somewhat cold and calculating, Interstellar is his warmest film to date. It’s all about love and the bond between a daughter and her father. Even though there were times when I questioned Murph’s feelings towards her father, I believed in Cooper the whole time. The love he had for his children was genuine. Although he so obviously favored Murphy that I felt sorry for his son, Tom (a waste of Casey Affleck). There is no mention of Tom at all at the end, I found it very bizarre. Anyways, Matthew McConaughey was very good in Interstellar. I especially loved the scene in which Cooper watches videos from his children (well, mostly Tom) that span 23 years. It was just so heartbreaking to see something like that. I don’t think Matthew was good enough to get an Oscar nomination, but who knows. The actors in Nolan films don’t get much love from the Academy aside from Heath Ledger.
Overall I think Interstellar is a good film. I have some problems with the characters and exposition, so that keeps it from being amazing. I will give Nolan kudos for making a huge blockbuster that makes the audience think about what they are seeing. And Nolan also still manages to surprise. Which is a real treat in this day and age of spoilers and overexposure (there’s one cameo that I was quite surprised by). I’m glad I saw Interstellar. It scared me, surprised me, and ultimately challenged me. And it also made me want to read some Dylan Thomas again. 8/10
This is a review of the third (and hopefully the last) official trailer for Christopher Nolan’s film, Interstellar. Now I’m not a huge Nolan fan. I don’t think he’s an amazing director like the media likes to paint him. I think he’s good, but for me his films seem impersonal. They never really touch me too deeply. And they are almost always way too long. Quantity does not make up for quality. I like The Dark Knight, but its third act is over long. Inception did not blow my mind. It’s good, but I haven’t felt tempted to even give it a second viewing. I will say though that I found The Prestige to be quite gripping and thrilling, by far my favorite Nolan film.
Nolan’s latest film, Interstellar, is about a group of explorers who travel through space trying to find a way to save the doomed human population on Earth. Something like that anyways, as always the plot around Nolan’s film is very vague. Which is good, Nolan never gives too much away and that’s rare in today’s society. Alright, alright, alright Matthew McConaughey is the film’s lead with support from Anne Hathaway, Jessica Chastain, Michael Caine, and Casey Affleck (a favorite of mine).
With the first trailer for Interstellar I felt like there was nothing about this film that appealed to me. I’m not into sci-fi or space travel. I don’t like any of the main actors too much and I don’t like Nolan. But wow, something about this trailer has really blown my mind. I feel like I have to see Interstellar now. It’s going to be an event, not just a film, and everyone will be talking about it.
I like the music in this trailer a lot. The score in Nolan’s films is often quite good (some of it in The Dark Knight was irritating though). Strangely enough I think the music is my favorite part of the trailer. It just really draws me into that world and pulls at my heart strings. It is timed very well with the scenes show in the trailer.
Anne Hathaway is a little annoying in this trailer. I don’t know how much of it is her or the character she is playing. Her voice is monotone and her character just seems like a bitch. Nothing likeable there. One of my big problems with Nolan’s films is how he handles women. Most of the women in his films are one dimensional. They’re just background noise or a plot device. And unfortunately the negative depiction of women seems to be continuing here with Anne Hathaway as the bitch and Jessica Chastain as the damsel in distress (since she’s stuck on Earth). I wish for once Nolan would give us a fully-fledged female character. Anyways, Matthew McConaughey seems alright though and I think he’s a good choice for the lead role. He’s likeable, average and simply gives off a good guy vibe. Interstellar really does look like an interesting movie. The trailer hits all of the right notes. But most of all, the mystery around the film is why I will be seeing it when it hits theaters November 7. It is very rare for there to be a film these days in which the plot hasn’t already been revealed beforehand. Visually too it will be interesting to see what kind of CGI effects are used and a god way to see how far technology has come. And the cinematography looks quite stunning, I wish I were able to see the film in IMAX. Alright, alright, I’ll give Christopher Nolan another chance to impress me and hopefully this time he won’t fail.
This film is about an immigrant who moves to New York in 1981, statistically one of the city’s most violent years, and tries to provide for his family by taking advantage of the rampant corruption. The film stars Oscar Isaac and Jessica Chastain and is directed by J. C. Chandor. I like this trailer. I find it very intriguing and I like that not too much is revealed in it. Most trailers give away the entire film these days. This one, fortunately, does not. I’m not a huge Jessica Chastain fan, I don’t find her particularly amazing. If anything I think she’s kind of boring and the way everyone seems to fawn over her just turns me off. But anyways, I’ll give her another chance when I see this film. I found her to be one of the most interesting aspects of this trailer. Will she be the typical housewife like Lorraine Bracco’s character in Goodfellas? Or will she push her husband to go to extremes? The trailer as a whole reminds me of Goodfellas for some reason. Maybe because it’s set in the 80s, but it’s also the same kind of tale of decent into corruption. Although Goodfellas had a lot of humor to it as well whereas this seems very serious. Which isn’t necessarily a good thing. Anyways, the film comes out December 31, 2014 and I’m intrigued enough that I might actually drag myself to the theater to see it.